Anne leaned close and said confidentially, “I don’t know how
you feel about nonviolent civil disobedience, but I have done it a few times,
and some of the people around here don’t approve because I broke the law.” I
had just asked her if she felt comfortable in the “Old Folks Home” with her
radical politics, and this was how she prefaced her answer. I shared that I,
too, had performed nonviolent civil disobedience. We compared notes. Both of us
had participated in nonviolent protests against nuclear weapons in the 1980s.
Anne said she never actually went to jail for her actions. I did. This
conversation took place at a residential senior community that I had the pleasure
to visit for a couple of days last week. Anne has dedicated her life to
political activism to promote peace and justice. I agree with her belief that
the only way to make lasting positive change is through nonviolent action. It’s
obvious to both of us that violence only breeds more violence. Violence is
therefore not a viable method for transformation; it’s a dead end.
The rest of her answer to my question was interesting. She
said that most of the people at the Old Folks Home don’t talk about politics
and this helps them all get along with each other nicely. She understands that
avoiding politics keeps the peace and makes for more pleasant interactions. But
she explained that she lived her whole life in NYC in the embrace of a
politicized activist community, where she talked politics all the time with her
friends. Missing these conversations, she relished talking to me, a kindred progressive
spirit. Anne has put her safety on the line to stand up and speak out many
times in her life. She has stood witness to protect indigenous people in Columbia.
Miraculously, since they are about as old as snow, her husband Tom is also
still living. He is a Quaker minister with an impressive list of
accomplishments as well.
Anne and I paused in our conversation to listen in on Tom’s
conversation with a friend also seated at our dinner table. They were discussing
the consequences of climate change, and they wound up speculating about what
will happen after climate change has killed off all the human beings on the
planet. Calculating how many billions of years more life our sun has in it,
they reckoned that there will be enough time for some kind of human organisms
to evolve from the slime once again before the sun dies and Earth goes dark
forever. Tom’s friend says he finds comfort in this thought. Tom and his friend
are both men who have led productive lives and have a healthy acceptance of the
proximity of death that accompanies their advanced age. Of course they would
prefer for their life’s work to live after them, but if their work will
disappear with the entire human race in the wake of environmental collapse then
the second-best scenario to wish for might indeed be that the human race will
re-evolve into existence (if it’s possible for such a miracle to happen again).
There is much to love about humanity, despite all its failings. Perhaps humans
will have a second go at it.
We were so caught up in the conversation at our table that
we lost track of the time. Almost everyone else had left the dining hall before
us. A number of them had adjourned to a lecture offered that evening. We
hurried to the lecture straight from the dining room. It happened to be the
second-to-last lecture in a series of 50 lectures called Big History that had been going for over a year. From what I
gathered, the first Big History
lecture had been about the creation of the universe. The lectures had moved
forward from there, looking at the gradual development of the solar system, our
planet and the life on it that had evolved over billions of years. The lecture felt
like an extension of the dinner conversation about the consequences of climate
change and possible future scenarios.
The lecturer devoted some time to imagining the colonization
and terraforming of another planet as an exit strategy for a people unable to
survive on a destroyed Earth. I read a sci-fi not long ago called Red Mars about a team of scientists who
go to Mars and change the environment on the planet so that it will be
habitable for humans. The lecturer’s speculations reminded me of this book.
Although I must say that this discussion makes me wonder why we would go to all
the trouble of sending people to Mars and making it habitable when we already
have a perfectly good planet that could be fixed with the same
not-so-sci-fi-as-all-that terraforming activities. With some organization,
commitment, relinquishment of what is easy, and willingness to abandon profit
motives, we humans could change the climate of Earth back to something more
conducive to sustaining human life deeper into the future. Why not seed rain
clouds, restore the habitat in the oceans needed to bring back disappearing essential
marine life, and stop pouring toxins into our soil? Just saying.
There was something extraordinary for me about having these
conversations and attending this lecture in the company of these old souls. At
60 years of age, I qualify as an elder myself, but not nearly as much as the
people at the Old Folks Home, who are a generation or more older than I. The
people with whom I ate dinner and those who attended the Big History lecture have spent many more years than I thinking
deeply about the tough questions, the progress of the universe, the future, and
what lies in store for humans as well as other life on the planet. Life felt
somehow more authentic, more explicable, and more functional in their presence.
It moved me to witness these elders strategizing and caring about the condition
of the planet left for future generations. It reminded me that some of us have
done our level best. Some of us try to think forward unto the seventh
generation and to preserve what we have received. The odds are so much not in
our favor, but I believe that trying counts for something in the context of Big History. Trying is evidence that we
are not oblivious. Trying is evidence that we have loved this world.
Here’s a picture of me delighting
in a magnificent magnolia in full magenta bloom in NJ last week. Our
compromised world is so beautiful. The ephemeral quality of worldly beauty is
achingly poignant. This magnolia is a blip of vibrant pink too small for notice
in the vast reach of Big History. I’m
glad I’m insignificant enough to enjoy a springtime magnolia.
Photo by Ron Reed
2 comments:
Amy- Have you read Reb Zalman's book, From Age-ing to Sage-ing? It's right up your alley I think!
I have heard of it. I'm a big fan of Reb Zalman. I'll look for it. Thanks for the recommendation.
Post a Comment