I have a confession: I don’t read poetry anymore. It’s
embarrassing given the fact that I have a master’s degree in English and it’s
astonishing considering the fact that I wrote nothing but poetry for more than
a dozen years in my youth. I didn’t purposely give up on poetry. I did not
attend a 12-Step Poetry Recovery Program. The words in poems are footsteps carefully
placed and each one requires attentive care and pondering. You can’t skip over
words in poems; and I don’t have the patience to read every word like I used to.
Though I can’t remember specifically, I think I crossed over from having an
obsession with poetry to no longer writing the stuff when I became a mom. Once
the children arrived, I found that I had stories to tell that could not fit
into a few carefully crafted lines. So I guess you could say that I went beyond
poetry when life got sloppy.
Consider the haiku, a Japanese form of poetry that I do
still love, and read on occasion, mainly because it’s brief. A traditional haiku
must be seventeen syllables. I mention this because I read a haiku recently
that summed up my relationship (as a writer of epic fiction) with poetry. It
went like this: “Take me down to Haiku-City
where the grass is green and dammit.” Ran out of syllables, couldn’t finish the
thought. There you go. I need to spread out. I need a lot of space to tell a
story. I can’t do it in a poem anymore. I have tried writing flash fiction and
it’s painful. This is why you won’t find me on Twitter. I can’t possibly say
anything in 140 characters. Unless of course by characters we mean people. I
could do a lot with 140 people-characters in a marathon novel. I could, if hard
pressed, crystalize a thought. But why would I want to? I am fascinated by the
context.
I just looked for my old poems so I could share one, and I
can’t seem to find the box in which they’re stored. (None of them are on my
computer, of course.) That’s just as well because, if memory serves, a
disproportionate amount of my college poetry revolved around sex. I hope my children
fail to locate that box when I am dead as it would embarrass the socks off
them. Super-duper ewww. In retrospect, it was excellent discipline for me as a
young writer to attempt so many poetic descriptions of sex since it’s one of
the hardest things to write well. I have labored over sex scenes in my novels.
They should be erotic, and not pornographic. They should be poetic, touching,
emotional, and not corny, silly, clichéd. One of the highest compliments I have
received was when a woman told me that Memories
from Cherry Harvest had great sex in it. Sex scenes should arouse and move
the reader, not make the reader wince. You don’t want blather like “she felt
his member throb against her thigh like a swollen banana preparing to fly on
wings of longing” or “he cupped the rounded spheres of her rear-end
lasciviously yet as tenderly as the first peaches of summer.” See what I’m
saying? Fifty shades of pathetic descriptions of sex. Super-duper eww. In all
seriousness, writers have been trying to describe the mystery of the sexual
experience for centuries. It’s one of those things that tries to escape the
confines of words.
Life itself tries to escape the confines of words. For this
very reason, I never grow tired of the thrill of capturing the living moment
with my words or reading someone else’s brilliantly constructed insight or
portrayal. Occasionally I stumble across a poem that speaks to me, that delights
me with its perfection. I remember many poems from back in the day that held
meaning for me (not that I memorized them word for word). Here is one of my
favorites by William Carlos Williams that popped into my head when I was under
my plum tree the other day.
This is Just to Say
I have eaten
the plums
that were in
the icebox
and which
you were probably
saving
for breakfast
Forgive me
they were delicious
so sweet
and so cold
That’s the kind of poem I can still handle. I don’t have the
patience anymore for poems that require deciphering. (I once did. Can you
believe I wrote my master’s dissertation on Wallace Stevens? Go figure.) I
enjoy simple poems that paint a moment and go piercingly and swiftly to the
heart of the matter; and I do love a good, clean image in a poem. My taste in
prose, on the contrary, runs toward the complicated. I adore the many-layered
grand novel, like David Mitchell’s Cloud
Atlas. When I finished that book I turned to the first page and started it
all over again. Give me a long and complex novel with so many characters that I
can’t keep them straight or remember their names. I want to dwell in a book. I
want the author to create another world so that when I turn the pages I travel
somewhere else, somewhere outside my existence. I want to enter a parallel
universe that informs my life in this one. That’s probably why I like sci-fi so
much.
At my book group this month, we discussed reading a classic
novel together. When one of the people in the group suggested we read a
nineteenth century Russian novel, I lit up like a newly minted galaxy. I think
I frightened the group a tad with my roaring enthusiasm when I shared that I
had read War and Peace three times.
(Seriously, who reads War and Peace
once, let alone three times?) The person who made the suggestion hastened to
say that she thought perhaps a Dostoyevsky novella or a Tolstoy short story
would do nicely. My hopes were dashed.
When I hear other people talk about poetry these days, I
feel a twinge of regret. I sort of wish I enjoyed reading it. I will never
write it again. Come to think of it, my passion for writing fiction has
diminished in recent years as I have increasingly enjoyed writing the personal
essay. Or, to be more precise, the blog. I like writing this right here; this
ramble down the corridors of cyberspace; this throwing words at the wall and
hoping they stick to something. Or someone. I hope that occasionally they stick
to you, dear reader. If I ever become a famous blogger, it would be fun to host
a writing contest for the most wincingly worst descriptions of sex. Not
pornographic, just hilarious-awful. Are you with me on this?
Plums. Yum.
No comments:
Post a Comment